
This Ivory Research review takes an honest, critical look at one of the UK’s longest-running custom academic writing services. Ivory Research (ivoryresearch.com) is a London-based company that has marketed bespoke essays, coursework and dissertations to students since the mid-2000s. On the surface it presents itself as a premium, UK-graduate-staffed provider. Beneath that polish, however, it operates in the contract-cheating category — a category that carries serious documented risks for any student who uses it. In this Ivory Research review we explain how the service works, what its pricing model looks like, and — most importantly — why our editorial position is that the risks outweigh any short-term convenience.
Based on the company’s own public-facing pages, Ivory Research sells custom-written academic work to order. A student fills in an online form specifying the academic level (from undergraduate through to Master’s and PhD), the type of work, the word count, the deadline and, in some cases, a target grade band. The company then assigns the task to a writer it describes as a UK graduate, and delivers a “bespoke” document for the customer to submit or use as they see fit.
Its publicly advertised catalogue is broad. It includes full custom essays, coursework, business plans, research proposals and complete dissertations, as well as individual dissertation components such as the literature review, methodology, analysis of findings, discussion and conclusion. Editing and proofreading services are also offered. The core commercial mechanic is consistent across all of these: you pay, a writer produces original-sounding text on your topic, and the finished file is handed to you.
We will not quote specific figures here, because prices change and vary by order. What matters for this Ivory Research review is the pricing model, which the company describes openly: cost is driven by academic level, the type and length of the work, the deadline, and — for some products — the requested grade band. Higher academic levels (PhD, postgraduate) and tighter deadlines push the price up. Quotes are generated instantly through the order form.
From a buyer’s perspective the model looks transparent. From an academic-integrity perspective, the variables tell the real story: you are paying more for higher-stakes work submitted under your own name — which is precisely where the consequences of getting caught are most severe.
The following risks apply to the essay-mill category as a whole. They are documented, well-established concerns about contract cheating generally, and they are the reason our editorial verdict on services like this is negative.
Submitting purchased work as your own is contract cheating, and virtually every university treats it as a serious academic misconduct offence. Documented penalties across institutions range from a zero on the assessment, to failing the module, to suspension, to expulsion. In the most serious cases, where misconduct is discovered after graduation, institutions have provisions to retroactively revoke a degree. No “bespoke” guarantee changes the fact that the act of submitting bought work is itself the violation.
Detection has become far more capable. Universities routinely run submissions through plagiarism-matching tools, increasingly use AI-content detectors, and apply stylometry — comparing a submission’s writing style against a student’s known prior work. A paper that does not sound like you, that appears suddenly at a higher standard, or that an examiner can probe in a viva, is a realistic route to being caught.
A documented, category-wide problem is that purchased work is frequently not the original, expert product advertised. Within the essay-mill industry generally, delivered work has been found to be plagiarized, partly or wholly AI-generated, or recycled from material previously sold to other customers. A buyer has limited ability to verify originality before submitting — and bears all the risk if the content is flagged.
To place an order, a student typically hands over their identity, contact details, institution, assignment brief and payment information. This creates a lasting record that the student paid for academic work. There is a documented and growing problem of blackmail and extortion in this industry: operators or third parties have used customers’ own records to threaten exposure to their university unless further payments are made. Once you have handed over that data, you have limited control over how it is stored or used.
In the UK specifically, the law has moved against essay mills. Under the Skills and Post-16 Education Act 2022, it is a criminal offence to provide or arrange essay-mill services for students in England. That is a documented legal fact about the UK environment in which a UK-focused service operates. For the buyer, weak recourse compounds the problem: refund terms in this category are frequently narrow, and operators are often based offshore, which makes meaningful redress difficult.
Editorial note: The risks above are presented as general, documented concerns about contract cheating and the essay-mill category. They are not specific accusations against Ivory Research.
This is our editorial opinion. Ivory Research is a long-established, professionally presented operator with a transparent ordering and pricing model. None of that changes the underlying problem: its core product — custom work for a student to submit — sits squarely in a category whose documented downsides include failure, suspension, expulsion, retroactive degree revocation, exposure to blackmail, and, in the UK, criminal illegality of the service itself. In our opinion, the convenience does not come close to justifying that exposure.
Risk rating (our opinion): High Risk — not recommended for submission as your own work.
If you are struggling, the safer path is help that builds your own work rather than replacing it. Legitimate options include your university’s writing centre, supervisor office hours, peer study groups, and genuine tutoring or coaching that teaches structure, research and editing — support you can openly disclose and that leaves the authorship unambiguously yours. For services we consider lower-risk and learning-focused, see our Recommended section.
In the UK, the Skills and Post-16 Education Act 2022 made it a criminal offence to provide or arrange essay-mill services for students in England. For the student, the more immediate exposure is academic: submitting purchased work as your own is misconduct under university rules regardless of where the service operates.
Increasingly, yes. Institutions use plagiarism matching, AI-content detection and stylometric comparison against your previous work, and examiners can probe authorship in vivas. There is no reliable guarantee that bought work will pass undetected.
You should assume there is risk. Ordering means handing over identifying and payment details that create a record you paid for academic work. The industry has a documented and growing blackmail problem, where such records have been used to extort customers.
Use legitimate, disclosable support: your writing centre, your supervisor, study groups, and tutoring that coaches your own skills. It keeps authorship yours, carries no misconduct risk, and actually improves your ability for the next assignment.






